July 8, 2015

Updates and Such

As you may have noticed, I've been absent for a while. Many big life events have been happening for me, including getting engaged and planning a wedding! While I still love the Tudors, I have also gotten into many other time periods, from Ancient Egypt to the Wars of the Roses. I plan on publishing occasionally, but for now keep up with updates on Facebook:

May 11, 2014

Author Amy License Virtual Book Tour - Excerpt from "Richard III: the Road to Leicester"

I am pleased to welcome author Amy License to the Tudor Book Blog today. To celebrate her virtual tour, she has given us a "juicy" excerpt from her book Richard III: the Road to Leicester.

Taken from the chapters ‘Bosworth: August 1485’ and ‘Aftermath: 1485-2012’: 
"If he was troubled by deserters or bad dreams, Richard’s mood on the morning of 22 August did not betray it. He assembled his men near Fenn Lane, between the villages of Dadlington, Sutton Cheney and Shenton. Vergil confirms the presence of this marsh and it was here that a recent excavation unearthed one of Richard’s gilt boar badges. For centuries Ambion Hill had been the favoured location but excavations in 2010 showed that it was likely to have been fought over a mile and a half away and spread over a considerable distance.14 They may have been between 8,000 and 10,000 strong, although some sources place the number much higher, and were led by Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk; his son Thomas, Earl of Surrey; and Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland. The Tudor army was about half their size, under the command of John de Vere, Earl of Oxford, and the Breton Philibert de Chandée. Vergil estimated their number at 5,000. 
The moment was approaching. Richard paraded before his assembled troops, delivering a rousing speech against the Welsh ‘milksop’ and displaying both the crown and a large cross. This was designed to demonstrate that God was on his side, as a pious, anointed King of England. When Tudor’s army advanced midmorning, they found themselves under bombardment from Richard’s artillery. This was unexpected and forced them to respond quickly, regrouping themselves around the marsh. Croyland says that at this point, Richard saw the chance to attack them; his army ‘assaulted’ them with arrows, making ‘great showtes’ before descending into brutal hand-to-hand fighting. Something made them stop and regroup though, after which Tudor’s French forces appeared on Norfolk’s flank with the sun behind them. They crashed through the army with longspears and probably inspired the king’s comment, mentioned in a letter quoted by Alfred Spont in 1897, that ‘these French traitors are today the cause of our realm’s ruin’. Vergil states that this was the point when Richard was urged to flee the battlefield, but he chose to remain. 
Perhaps this was when he spotted Henry, coming up with the rearguard of his army. His standards of the Red Dragon, St George and the Dun Cow were visible beyond the fighting, isolated from the main body of troops. Only a small group of troops huddled about him and Oxford was too far to come to his assistance. It presented an ideal opportunity; if Richard could charge down the hill and kill his opponent, the battle was his. Although writers like Holinshed presented Richard launching himself lion-like into hand-to-hand fighting with Henry, the fragment of a letter written by a surviving French soldier suggests that they were separated by a formation of pikemen. It seems likely that the hired mercenaries clustered protectively around Tudor but that he was still in grave danger, as Richard was close enough to kill his standard bearer, Sir William Brandon, and unseat Sir John Cheyney from his horse. It was at this moment, when Henry’s life was in ‘immediate danger’, that the Stanleys entered the field, on behalf of Sir Thomas’s stepson. Charging downhill at the head of 3,000 men, the new arrival took Richard by surprise and he was pushed back into the nearby marshland, according to a number of writers. Here, he lost his horse and possibly his helmet before, in Molinet’s words, a Welshman ‘struck him dead with a halberd’. A proclamation later issued by Tudor stated that he died at a place known as Sandeford, although the exact location of this has now been lost. 
Even historians negative in their portrayals of Richard have acknowledged his bravery on the field of battle. During his lifetime, Mancini acknowledged his ‘renown in warfare’, Whitelaw recognised his ‘greatest valour’ and Edward IV wrote of his brother’s ‘proved skill in military matters’ in a letter to the Pope. Vergil wrote in 1520 that Richard’s courage was ‘high and fierce’ and that he fought ‘manfully’. In The Ballad of Bosworth Field, Richard is offered a fresh horse as a means of escaping the scene, with his knight suggesting that ‘another day thou may thy worshipp win’ and return again to rule. Richard replied that he would never flee so long as breath remained in his body. Then the poet, who possibly fought for the Stanleys and was in the thick of battle at this point, records that the king’s crown of gold was ‘hewn’ from him; other sources suggest that his helmet was beaten into his head. Death would follow swiftly afterwards, but his final moments would not be fully understood until the examination of his bones in 2012. With the loss of Richard III, the battle was over. 
Word flew across the battlefield that the king had been killed. The fighting would have spread well away from the spot where Richard fell but gradually, the men were stilled by the news. They lowered their swords and axes and withdrew, to get their wounds attended to, to pray and to rest. According to William Hutton, writing in 1788, Richard’s crown was lost in his ‘last fiery struggle’, being found or concealed by ‘a private soldier’ in a hawthorn bush, ‘perhaps with a view to secure it for himself’.1 This must have been a lightweight coronet, specifically designed to sit around his crown; Ashdown-Hill speculates that it may have been gold or gilded metal, set with jewels or paste, of sufficient value to attract a thief. It was discovered by Sir Reginald Bray and handed to Stanley, who used it to crown Henry VII at once where they stood. The Tudor dynasty had begun. In the immediate aftermath, the field was scattered with bodies and debris. Estimates for the number of dead vary from the 10,000 given by the Castilian Report to Molinet’s 300 on either side.2 In the lull between Richard’s death and the cessation of all conflict, looters moved quickly among the bodies, stripping them of clothing, valuables or pieces of armour that could be melted down. Hutton includes examples of the way local people were still using their finds from the area 300 years later: a blacksmith living nearby was still using a sword blade as a drill and an old woman used another for a spit for roasting meat. Other trophies were collected too; Sir William Stanley selected a set of tapestries from Richard’s baggage train while Margaret Beaufort received his personal prayer book. The debris must have spread for miles and search parties would have been sent out to identify those who had been lost. Among them, in the swampy marshland, they found the body of the dead king. 
As Croyland describes, Richard’s body was offered ‘many other insults’ and treated with ‘insufficient humanity’. Naked, he was thrown across the back of a horse, with a rope about his neck5 and his hands tied. Then he was brought back into Leicester on the same route by which he had ridden out in glorious splendour. The examination of his bones revealed that he had been inflicted with at least one humiliation injury, stabbed in the buttock, probably on this journey. Legend has it that his head struck upon Bow Bridge as they arrived, just as his spur had done, by ill omen, as he rode to battle. Holinshed records that he was uncovered, with ‘not so much as a clout to cover his privie members’ and carried ‘trussed … like a hog or calfe, his head and armes hanging on the one side of the horse, and his legs on the other side, and all besprinkled with mire and blood’. His white boar badge was ‘violently razed and plucked down from every sign’ because those rejoicing at his death ‘wished the memorie of him to be buried with his carren corpse’."

April 16, 2014

And the Winner Is...

Using Random.org, I randomly chose a winner from those who entered out giveaway for Lauren Mackay's Inside the Tudor Court.

And the winner is...

Stephanie O.

Congrats, Stephanie! Please contact me by April 23rd to claim your prize! :)

For those who did not win, thank you for entering! Be sure to check back for other giveaways in the future!

April 4, 2014

Virtual Book Tour for 'Inside the Tudor Court': Q&A with Author Lauren Mackay and Giveaway!

I am excited to welcome author Lauren Mackay to the Tudor Book Blog today! Her new work, Inside the Tudor Court, focuses on Chapuys, Spanish ambassador during the reign of Henry VIII. I will be posting my review of this book later today, so be sure to check back for that!

1. What is your writing routine? (i.e. cup of coffee early in the morning, etc.)

It depends on what I write, which varies day to day. Juggling my PhD and the book was a challenge, as I had to be in a different head space and use a different voice. I hate writing in silence, I need noise. Music is good, of course, but I find some of my best writing happens when I’m out in the world, hearing a dozen different conversations and listening to the rhythms and textures flying by. I go out with my laptop of a morning, wherever I am. In London, I like to sit on the steps of the British Museum, or in a corner of a pub with my laptop. At home in Sydney, anywhere green, anywhere near water. I allot certain hours, but I like to leave book research and writing for the morning, my PhD for the afternoon and evening.

2. What was one of the most interesting things you discovered while researching and reading Chapuys’ letters?

We have taken Chapuys for granted. His letters, and here I refer to the translations, do not allow for any identity, nuance, or humanity. Because of this, he has been allowed t remain a mere source, rather than a shrewd, principles and meticulous observer and player at the Tudor Court. Many of his relationships have become steeped in myth, and a close study of his letters revealed the true nature of these relationships. But his letters to his family struck me; his concern for his mother, his nieces and nephews. I aimed to restore these dimensions to his character.

3. What inspired you to focus on this time period for your research?

Ancient Greece and Egypt have always been by passion, but I remember watching Henry V with Kenneth Brannagh at an early age, and my love for British history grew from there.

4. What other time periods do you enjoy writing about?

The Tudor period occupies most of my time, but certainly Greece and Norse history.

5. Do you feel Chapuys offered a fair view of Henry VIII and his reign? 

No view is without bias, and of course Chapuys saw Henry’s treatment of Katherine and his daughter as unforgivable. Henry through Chapuys’ eyes is certainly flawed, but in a sense more human than the monarch of mythical proportions. He was opposed to Anne, yes, but his reports are for the most part moderate, and he was always careful to couch any rumors about her as just that. I would say he offered us a vibrant, human, and complex court full of life, intrigue, and drama.

6. What historical figure inspires you the most?
I don’t think I have one in particular, I am inspired by any historical figure who has furthered our knowledge, inspired our passions and taught us about our own nature.

I want to extend a huge thank you to Lauren for including us in her virtual book tour! I actually have a few more Q&A's, but for some reason they did not transfer correctly in the e-mail. If I am able to get those working, I will post the remaining few questions.

If you want to learn more about Lauren Mackay and her wonderful book, be sure to check out her website.

Now on to the giveaway!

Lauren Mackay has graciously offered a free copy of her book to one lucky winner! 

To enter, simply leave a comment below with your first name and last initial, and brief mentioning your favorite Tudor-era primary source (this can be a letter, document, painting, etc. -- Anything from that time period that gives us some clue about life back then). If you aren't sure, check out some good examples here.

Be sure to enter by midnight on April 12th. The winner will be announced on April 13th. Good luck!

January 3, 2014

Tudor Book Blog Reading Challenge: Winners!

I'm so excited to have gotten through another Reading Challenge with all of you! You have read some amazing books, and offered great insight into them. I know I learned of a few new reads while watching your progress.

Now, for the moment we've been waiting for...

The winner of the most books reviewed is: Eva
The runner up for the most books reviewed is: Esther

The randomly drawn winner is: Jaclyn

Both Jaclyn and Esther will receive a copy of my new favorite Tudor book, In the Footsteps of Anne Boleyn by Sarah Morris and Natalie Grueninger. 

Eva, as our most read/reviewed books winner, will receive a $25.00 Amazon gift card to spend on a new Tudor book or two for her library!

Ladies, please e-mail me at everythingtudor "at" yahoo.com with your mailing address by Jan. 10th to claim your prize. If I do not hear from you, I will randomly draw another name to receive the prize. 

Thanks to all of you who joined! It was a great year, and I look forward to more great reads in the future! I won't be doing a year long challenge again this coming year, but I will be doing a summer reading challenge, so be sure to check back for that! 

Happy reading!